Femi Falana Opposes Amnesty for Terror Suspects
Femi Falana criticises negotiations with terror suspects, insisting prosecution remains the lawful path to accountability.
Human rights lawyer Femi Falana has criticised both the Federal and State Governments for negotiating with terror suspects and bandits instead of prosecuting them under Nigerian law.
Speaking at Amnesty International’s Second Annual General Meeting in Abuja, Falana argued that authorities have increasingly engaged in discussions with insurgents and bandits, leading to the forgiveness and reintegration of thousands of individuals described as repentant fighters. He also claimed that some of these individuals reportedly received financial assistance as part of the process.
According to Falana, groups such as Boko Haram have already been proscribed under Nigeria’s Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, making prosecution the appropriate legal response. He stressed that the law provides clear provisions regarding involvement with proscribed organisations and warned against actions that could weaken accountability. The issue of terrorism prosecution remains central to his argument.
The senior advocate further stated that state governors do not possess the constitutional authority to grant pardons to individuals accused of terrorism-related offences. He explained that suspects should first be prosecuted by the Attorney-General of the Federation and, where convictions are secured, sentenced according to the law before any discussion of clemency can take place.
Falana also referred to sections of the anti-terrorism legislation that prescribe strict penalties for people who knowingly support, organise, facilitate or participate in activities linked to terrorist groups. He maintained that adherence to these provisions is necessary to uphold the rule of law and strengthen public confidence in the justice system.
The lawyer warned that pardoning individuals accused of kidnapping, killings, attacks on schools and other violent crimes could undermine justice, national security and public safety. He argued that terrorism prosecution is essential for ensuring accountability, protecting victims and maintaining confidence in Nigeria’s legal framework. Falana insisted that terrorism prosecution must remain a priority in addressing serious security offences.
Should governments prioritise prosecution over rehabilitation when dealing with individuals accused of terrorism-related crimes?
Comments are closed.