ASUU Offers UTAS As IPPIS Replacement

***Lawan Condemns FG Over Failed Agreements

44

 

The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has offered a new payment option, ‘University Transparency and Accountability Solution (UTAS)’, to the Federal Government in replacement for its Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System (IPPIS).

ASUU President, Prof. Biodun Ogunyemi, disclosed this to the members of the Senate Press Corps after a closed-door meeting with the leadership of the Senate.

President Muhammadu Buhari had last Thursday directed stoppage of payment of salary of any university staff not enrolled on the IPPIS.

The Office of the Accountant General of the Federation had consequently written the vice chancellors of federal universities through the committee of vice chancellors, notifying them that the names of university staff not enrolled on IPPIS would be removed from the payroll from November 2020.

Addressing the media after the three hours meeting with the senate leadership, ASUU president said UTAS was an home-grown method that would end its ongoing eight-month industrial action, if embraced by the Federal Government.

He said “I can only say for now, we had a positive meeting which was cordial and we are going to continue from there.

“What we have started is to open the issues, we will still meet again to continue from where we stopped.

“We have developed what we call University Transparency and Accountability Solution. We have presented it to the Senate today and the Senate President commended it.

“We are going to present the platform to other stakeholders. UTAS is home grown while IPPIS is foreign, we are talking about local content.

“We have shown that we are inventors, we are creators of software and we are also capable of doing what our colleagues are doing in other parts of the world.

“Nigerian scholars are not inferior why should we be patronising foreigners for what we can do in Nigeria?”

Ogunyemi said ASUU had never shifted from its position to oppose the IPPIS which would not benefit his members.

He noted the visit was a follow up to the earlier one held between ASUU and the Senate in October 2019 to find a way out of the IPPIS crisis.

The university teachers and the Senate leadership had at the October meeting agreed that ASUU would design an alternative to the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System

The ASUU leaders had on the occasion urged the Senate leadership to give them an opportunity to design a payroll system that would accommodate the peculiarity of the university system.

In his opening remarks, before the closed session, the Senate President said the meeting was to explore further, how the Senate and indeed the National Assembly could intervene to resolve the issues that were yet outstanding.

He berated the Federal Government for signing an unrealistic agreement with the ASUU.

Lawan wondered why the representatives of the Federal Government would endorse an agreement which they knew would not be implemented.

He said, “I think as parliamentarians we have to tell the truth as it is, no matter how bitter it may be at the right place and at the right time.

“When we sign agreements we must do so with full intention of implementing them.

” When we negotiate, we must negotiate in such a manner that the final product will be implementable.

“This is to say that we have to accommodate each others with government doing what it is supposed to do and ASUU being the body of our lecturers, stands to protect its members.

“Everybody else in the country must ensure that our universities remain open and functioning because it does not do anybody any good when the universities are shut.

“In fact, we just simply retrogress or at worst stagnate. We should work together to be able to find accommodation.”

IPPIS

Lawan said the meeting between the Senate and ASUU was meant to look into areas of agreement and see how to accommodate ASUU as well as how the government would be able to implement the agreements.

He also pleaded with the ASUU not to be too rigid in its demands in order to move the country forward.

He said, “I am sure that we need to review some of the items on the agreements, I don’t know who will be hurt when I say that but the reality is that so many things have happened.

“We cannot have an agreement signed in 2009 and still think this is the only way we can deal with it.

“We should be able to have a look at the agreements signed and see at this time whether or not some of the issues are really practicable at all.

“We have to be realistic. I always hold this belief that government should not sign agreements when it knows that it cannot implement them.

“Under whatever situation, let the government be practical and ASUU, being a very patriotic body, will understand with the government when there is sincerity and honesty in negotiating such agreements”

“Sometimes you wonder how somebody would sign some of these agreements and later say I cannot implement them. Why did you sign in the first place?”

Comments are closed.